Intercepted Iranian communications downplay damage from U.S. attack, Washington Post reports
- On Sunday, The Washington Post reported intercepted Iranian communications downplaying U.S. strike damage, contradicting Trump’s claims of total destruction.
- The U.S. ordered strikes on Iran's nuclear sites in Natanz, Fordow, and Isfahan to disrupt its nuclear program, though full damage remains uncertain due to limited intelligence.
- Leaked Pentagon summaries reveal tunnels remain intact, setting Iran’s nuclear program back only months, with full damage assessments expected to take weeks due to limited visibility.
- White House Press Secretary Leavitt dismisses leaked Iran damage reports as nonsense, threatens prosecution of leakers, amid Trump's claims of total destruction of Iran's nuclear program.
- Officials say a full damage assessment may take weeks amid ongoing debate over the strikes' effectiveness and credibility of intelligence reports.
87 Articles
87 Articles
Iranian phone call on US strikes leaked to media, White House responds
The Washington Post reported new, leaked information from anonymous U.S. officials related to the recent U.S. airstrikes on Iran. According to the report, the U.S. intercepted phone calls between Iranian leaders who downplayed the damage. Intercepted calls claim limited damage at nuclear facilities The intercepted communications reportedly show Iranian officials expressing doubts that the airstrikes caused serious damage. The calls, cited by fou…
WaPo publishes Iranian officials' take on bomb damage to undercut Trump · American Wire News
The mainstream media is desperate to spin President Donald Trump’s successful Iranian bombing into a bad thing, even going so far as to spitefully publish the statements of Iranian officials. John Hudson at the Washington Post published a “scoop” on intercepted communications, in which Iranian officials downplayed the severity of the bombings, wondering why they were “less devastating than expected.” This was likely intentionally done to create …
WaPo Publishes Intelligence Leak That Undermines Trump’s Iran Strike Claim — WH Responds - News Addicts
The Washington Post, published a US-intercepted communication between Iranian officials downplaying strikes on nuclear sites. This is the second intel leak related to the US’s strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. “The United States obtained intercepted communication between senior Iranian officials discussing this month’s military strikes on Iran’s nuclear program and remarking that the attack was […] The post WaPo Publishes Intelligence Leak That …
Pentagon Spox Rips Into Media’s ‘Weaponized Smear Campaign’ Against American Troops
Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell ripped into legacy media on Sunday, accusing outlets of fueling the “Iranian propaganda machine” because they were so desperate to smear President Donald Trump that they were willing to accept any collateral damage that followed — even if the majority of the damage landed on American service members.Parnell showcased a headline from The Washington Post that cast doubt on the success of the recent strikes car…
The US Attack on Iran Was Legal
After June 21, when the US bombed critical nuclear sites in Iran, some members of Congress called the mission illegal. It appears the hostilities have ended for now. But the legality of “Operation Midnight Hammer” is still debated. The question boils down to three issues: Was the US entitled under international law to enter the
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 37% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium