US Edition
In rare interviews, federal judges criticize Supreme Court's handling of Trump cases
- Judge Zia Faruqui criticized prosecutors for mishandling cases during President Trump's law enforcement surge in Washington, D.C., including dismissing a federal threat case against Edward Alexander Dana.
- Since the operation began on August 7, more than 1,800 individuals have been detained, many for minor offenses, as efforts intensify to address violent crime amid heightened federal involvement and public debate over increased prosecutions.
- FBI officials and former agents have expressed concern that the large-scale use of nearly 1,000 covert FBI vehicles in public operations could compromise undercover efforts, especially as gangs and foreign intelligence agencies actively seek to identify law enforcement personnel.
- Dana was arrested on August 17 for damaging a light fixture and allegedly threatening to kill Trump while intoxicated, but a grand jury refused to indict, leading to the federal case's dismissal and misdemeanor charges filed in local court.
- Faruqui said the judicial process is broken, accusing the prosecution of political motivations and calling on Pirro's office to explain its actions and apologize to Dana, while prosecutors denied losing credibility.
60 Articles
60 Articles
NEW: Several Activist Judges Reveal Anti-Trump Bias In Stunning Admission
While speaking with NBC News, a dozen federal judges expressed dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court for overturning their rulings in “Trump cases.” The article, titled “In rare interviews, federal judges criticize Supreme Court’s handling of Trump cases,” NBC News cited 12 anonymous federal judges who are “frustrated” that the high court continues to overturn their own sweeping, controversial rulings against the Trump Administration. The judge…
Rebellion: Anonymous Federal Judges Accuse Supreme Court of 'Undermining Judicial System' by Overturning Their Anti-Trump Rulings
NBC News reported shocking interviews with a dozen federal court judges who hid behind anonymity to attack the Supreme Court for overturning their anti-Trump decisions, accusing the conservative dominated Supreme Court of undermining the judiciary.
Federal judges criticize Supreme Court for overturning rulings and siding with Trump
A group of anonymous federal judges is criticizing the Supreme Court for overturning lower court rulings and siding with President Donald Trump's administration, reports claim.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 62% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
