Ignoring Substance, SCOTUS Permits Lawlessness

The Supreme Court ponders a conerstone of democracy – and sides with Donald Trump

Since his second inauguration in January, Donald Trump has issued more than 160 executive orders. These orders permit the US president to make directives concerning the workings of the federal government without the need to pass laws in Congress. All US presidents have used them, including George Washington, but Trump has issued his orders at an unprecedented rate.A number of these have courted controversy. But one stands out in particular: exec…

Anne Deysine, US law expert: 'We are experiencing the dawn of a lawless society'

In an interview, Anne Deysine, a US law specialist, explains that the US Supreme Court's June 27 ruling would lead to institutional 'chaos,' as Trump is now able to keep changing US institutions and society through his executive orders, which are often illegal.

Littwin: The birthright citizenship ruling is a direct warning that you shouldn’t expect the Supreme Court to save us

Open the article to view the coverage from Colorado Sun

Tong: Birthright Citizenship Remains Law, But SCOTUS Decision Left Chaos

HARTFORD, CT — While both sides claimed victory Friday, the status of birthright citizenship remains unclear despite the Supreme Court’s ruling regarding President Donald Trump’s executive order attempting to limit it.

Ignoring Substance, SCOTUS Permits Lawlessness

A visitor checks out the parking situation at the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. on June 27, 2025. (Photo by Alex Wroblewski / AFP via Getty Images)AS IT CLOSES OUT ITS TERM, the Supreme Court is continuing to find ways to let Donald Trump do whatever he wants without addressing the legality of the conduct in question.In an opinion announced on Thursday, the Court permitted South Carolina to refuse to provide Medicaid funding to…

A 'lawless' Supreme Court term closes with a birthright citizenship farce

In two cases this week, the Supreme Court showed a disregard for the real-world effects of its decisions that the dissent said was 'lawless.'