institutional access

You are connecting from
Lake Geneva Public Library,
please login or register to take advantage of your institution's Ground News Plan.

Published loading...Updated

How the Supreme Court ruled differently in immigration and criminal justice cases

Summary by KRDO
2022 RozenskiP // Shutterstock How the Supreme Court ruled differently in immigration and criminal justice cases As the Supreme Court wrapped up a spate of rulings at the end of its term, Justice Sonia Sotomayor didn’t mince words. Following a decision that voided the kind of universal, nationwide injunctions that had obstructed the Trump administration’s path to revoking birthright citizenship, Sotomayor read aloud from her dissenting opinion f…

23 Articles

Santa New MexicanSanta New Mexican
+22 Reposted by 22 other sources
Center

How the Supreme Court ruled differently in immigration and criminal justice cases

The Marshall Project reports on Supreme Court rulings that weakened universal injunctions, impacting immigration laws while some criminal justice cases favored litigants.

Read Full Article
Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 86% of the sources are Center
86% Center

Factuality 

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

KULR-TV broke the news in Billings, United States on Friday, July 25, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.