Harvard is hoping court rules Trump administration’s $2.6B research cuts were illegal
UNITED STATES, JUL 21 – A federal judge challenged the Trump administration's rationale for cutting $2.6 billion in research funding to Harvard, raising constitutional concerns over academic freedom.
- On Monday, Harvard University took legal action in federal court to contest the Trump administration’s decision to reduce its federal research funding by $2.6 billion.
- The funding reductions came after Harvard declined a set of requests outlined in an April letter from a federal task force focused on antisemitism, which the university says prompted a retaliatory response.
- Harvard's lawyer argued the cuts will devastate long-term research projects, eviscerate labs, and harm careers while the government insists it acted within its contract rights.
- At the hearing, Judge Burroughs questioned how cutting funding to cancer and other critical research relates to ending antisemitism, calling the constitutional consequences staggering.
- The case represents a significant dispute involving university autonomy and regulatory oversight, with Harvard aiming to reinstate funding before the September 3, 2025 deadline for completing grant closure documentation.
117 Articles
117 Articles
It's a new episode in the arm that pits Donald Trump from universities, including Harvard. On Monday, July 21, the two sides clashed in court. Harvard accuses the administration of violation of academic freedom, after the freezing of billions of dollars of funds essential to research.
Harvard takes Donald Trump to court in attempt to restore billions in federal funding
Harvard University yesterday urged a federal judge to order US president Donald Trump’s administration to restore about $2.5bn (€2.14bn) in cancelled federal grants and cease efforts to cut off research funding to the prestigious Ivy League school.
The U.S. government and Harvard are arguing in court about the planned deletion of research billions. Trump wants to know what the verdict is.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 47% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium