US Edition
Published • loading... • Updated
Grammarly pulls AI tool mimicking Stephen King and other writers
- Wednesday's filing in the Southern District of New York alleges Superhuman and Grammarly misappropriated writers' names, with plaintiff Julia Angwin claiming class damages in excess of $5,000,000.
- Superhuman last year added the Expert Review feature, which used an underlying large language model to offer AI feedback framed as if from famous writers or academics by subject matter.
- Even when Benjamin Dreyer, copy editor, pasted lorem ipsum, the feature offered tips attributed to writers including Stephen King, sat behind a $12-a-month Pro subscription with a disclaimer and opt-out.
- Shishir Mehrotra, CEO of Superhuman, wrote on LinkedIn that the company will disable Expert Review amid significant public backlash and reassess the feature shortly.
- The lawsuit raises broader ethical questions as plaintiffs allege class damages in excess of $5,000,000 under New York and California laws protecting writers, authors, journalists and editors.
Insights by Ground AI
22 Articles
22 Articles
Journalist Julia Angwin files class action lawsuit over Grammarly’s AI “sloppelgangers”
Grammarly will face a class action lawsuit over its “Expert Review” feature that dispensed writing advice using the names of prominent journalists, academics, and authors, Wired reported on Wednesday. Technology journalist Julia Angwin is the only named plaintiff on the original filing. Angwin’s lawyer, Peter Romer-Friedman, said on Thursday morning that he’s since heard from “40 to 50 people” who object to being featured in the AI-powered editi…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources22
Leaning Left5Leaning Right0Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution63% Left
Bias Distribution
- 63% of the sources lean Left
63% Left
L 63%
C 37%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
