Published • loading... • Updated
Forged signatures, bogus names: Tony Hsieh's will is fake, attorneys say
Richard Hsieh alleges forgery in Tony Hsieh's will, citing fake signatures and untraceable witnesses, and seeks to invalidate the document filed in Clark County probate court.
- On Monday, Dec. 15, Richard Hsieh filed a formal objection to the purported will in Clark County District Court, asking the court to declare it invalid and deny probate after extensive validation efforts by his attorneys.
- This past spring, attorneys Robert Armstrong and Mark Ferrario filed the purported will dated March 13, 2015, which was recently found among Pir Muhammad's belongings and claimed earlier this year by Kashif Singh.
- The court filing argues that a counterfeiting-document expert retained by Richard Hsieh's team found Tony Hsieh's signatures on the purported will fake, while Hsieh's calendars and financial/legal advisers show no evidence of a signing and the five attesting witnesses listed in the document cannot be located.
- The family now controls the estate with Richard Hsieh as court-appointed administrator, while attorneys Robert Armstrong and Mark Ferrario filed a June petition to remove him; a Clark County District Court hearing is scheduled for Thursday.
- He died on Nov. 27, 2020, at age 46 in a Connecticut house fire, and the Hsieh family says he left no will despite his prominence as former Zappos CEO who sold it for $1.2 billion.
Insights by Ground AI
8 Articles
8 Articles
Family of Late Zappos CEO Tony Hsieh Calls Purported Will a Scam
·Washington, United States
Read Full ArticleTony Hsieh’s will is a forgery, claim lawyers for his estate
Attorneys alleged the late Zappos CEO’s will, which surfaced years after his death, is a fake. His dad’s legal team stated multiple times in court filings that the younger Hsieh died without a will.
·Las Vegas, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources8
Leaning Left2Leaning Right3Center2Last UpdatedBias Distribution43% Right
Bias Distribution
- 43% of the sources lean Right
43% Right
L 29%
C 28%
R 43%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium






