Skip to main content
Black Friday Sale - Get 40% off Vantage
Published loading...Updated

Scjn Will Review Femsa’s Tax Credit Again and Claims that It Is Not “Judgment”

Summary by Proceso
With the FEMSA case, the Court could open a new way to intervene in multimillion dollar fiscal litigation on the basis of the amount in dispute, regardless of whether or not they involve a constitutional analysis.
DisclaimerThis story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.Cross Cancel Icon

9 Articles

The #SCJN reopens the case of #FEMSA after its ruling in favor of #SAT for 2 800 million pesos. Despite the fact that the plenary had refused to intervene, Minister Lenia Batres pushed for a new vote, changing the decision of six ministers. Experts consider this turn to be irregular, suggesting political influences and increasing doubts about the impartiality of the Court.

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) defended its decision to attract a review of an alleged million-dollar fiscal debt of FEMSA, despite the fact that it had previously rejected this possibility. The highest court stated that an initial rejection does not prevent a legitimate party from submitting a new application, since this determination “does not constitute a res judicata.” In an information card, the Court explained that the s…

The Supreme Court (SCJN) has surprised many by reopening the FEMSA case against the SAT (Mexican Tax Administration Service) over an alleged debt of millions of pesos. This move has sparked criticism regarding transparency and judicial independence.

Despite the fact that the plenary had refused to intervene, Minister Lenia Batres pushed for a new vote, changing the decision of six ministers. Experts consider this turn to be irregular, suggesting political influences and increasing doubts about the impartiality of the Court.

With the FEMSA case, the Court could open a new way to intervene in multimillion dollar fiscal litigation on the basis of the amount in dispute, regardless of whether or not they involve a constitutional analysis.

·Mexico
Read Full Article

“When arbitrariness is imposed as a rule, justice becomes an instrument of dominion.”Hannah Arendt“Justice without force is powerless; force without justice is tyrannical.”Blaise PascalIt was a long time ago that Blackism decided that besides controlling the Supreme Court, it should prostitute it. And the highest court, docile as rarely in its history, already accepted the new role: premium collector of the SAT. Minister Lenia Batres—yes, the on…

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

DineroenImagen broke the news in on Tuesday, November 25, 2025.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal