Editor’s Note: A federal magistrate judge has given litigators their first close look at how a court handles generative artificial intelligence making final responsiveness calls, and the answer required no new law. In Schulte v. LinkedIn Corp., the court denied three plaintiff demands aimed at LinkedIn’s Relativity aiR workflow and treated the tool as a form of technology-assisted review under the case’s existing ESI order. The order is nonprece…
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.