Federal Judge Partially Allows Challenge to Proceed Against Gun Ordinances in Boulder County
UNITED STATES, JUL 17 – The Third Circuit requires courts to assess individual risk before disarming marijuana users under federal law, affirming the ban while recognizing not all users pose a danger.
6 Articles
6 Articles
7th Circuit Court Drops the Hammer: Illegal Aliens Have No 2nd Amendment Rights
The battle over the meaning of “the people” in the Second Amendment just got a big update. In a unanimous 3-0 decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled this week that illegal aliens have no constitutional right to keep and bear arms. This landmark case—United States v. Carbajal-Flores—was brought after Heriberto Carbajal-Flores, a Mexican citizen unlawfully in the U.S., was arrested for firing a pistol in Chicago during t…
Federal judge partially allows challenge to proceed against gun ordinances in Boulder County
A federal judge on Thursday permitted firearm owners and two gun-rights organizations to proceed with their constitutional challenge to certain provisions of gun safety ordinances enacted by Boulder County and three of its municipalities.


Federal Court Upholds Gun Ban For Marijuana Users, But Requires ‘Individualized Judgments’ To Determine Dangerousness
A federal appeals court on Monday broadly upheld the nation’s ban on firearm possession by marijuana consumers but said that district courts must make “individualized judgments” to determine whether the law known as Section 922(g)(3) is constitutional as applied to particular defendants. In the case, U.S. v. Harris, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled that while a person “need not have harmed someone, thr…
AAF Stands for First Amendment Rights in NRA v. Vullo - Advancing American Freedom
Advancing American Freedom expressed its disappointment with the ruling of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, which found limited immunity for a bureaucrat who tried to intimidate insurance companies from doing business with the National Rifle Association. “No government official should have the power to deprive a lawful organization of a full range of financial services without facing constitutional review,” said J. Marc Wheat, AAF General Couns…
Federal Court Upholds Gun Ban For Marijuana Users, But Requires ‘Individualized Judgments’ To Determine Dangerousness - Cannabis News World
A federal appeals court on Monday broadly upheld the nation’s ban on firearm possession by marijuana consumers but said that district courts must make “individualized judgments” to determine whether the law known as Section 922(g)(3) is constitutional as applied to particular defendants. In the case, U.S. v. Harris, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court The post Federal Court Upholds Gun Ban For Marijuana Users, But Requires ‘Individualized Judg…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 33% of the sources lean Left, 33% of the sources are Center, 33% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium