Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Experts say treason definition depends if you’re holding Criminal Code or dictionary

Legal experts say Alberta separatists' meetings with U.S. officials do not meet criminal treason definitions, which require force or covert intelligence sharing, experts said.

  • On Thursday, B.C. Premier David Eby said Alberta separatists' reported meeting with U.S. officials amounted to treason, citing a Financial Times report and calling it inappropriate.
  • Under the Canadian Criminal Code, treason involves using force to overthrow the government or providing intelligence to foreign officials that threaten Canada's safety, while high treason addresses attacking the monarch or aiding enemies.
  • Observers noted the meetings were public and Jeff Rath, lawyer for the Alberta Prosperity Project, denied his actions amount to treason or criminal conduct.
  • Whether prosecutions follow depends on covert conversations, experts say, while Stewart Prest, political science lecturer, University of British Columbia, said Eby's 'treason' is blunt political talk, not prosecution.
  • Carvin said, `Treason and sedition and other similar offences, or even subversion, they're really tied to the idea of betraying Canada during a time of war,' highlighting their medieval origins, while files from Wolfgang Depner and Dayne Patterson noted some called the meetings treasonous by dictionary definitions.
Insights by Ground AI

9 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 78% of the sources lean Left
78% Left

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Rocky Mountain Outlook broke the news in on Thursday, January 29, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal