Dutch Court Scraps Cap on Number of Flights at Amsterdam Airport
The Dutch Council of State ruled the flight cap at Schiphol airport was unjustified due to inadequate noise measurement, removing the 478,000 annual flight limit but keeping night flight restrictions.
- On Wednesday, the Council of State, the highest Dutch administrative court, tore up limits on flights to and from Schiphol airport, ruling the government had not justified an overall cap.
- Former transport minister Barry Madlener introduced the 478,000 annual take-offs and landings limit last year to reduce noise, prompting appeals from airlines, local residents, councils, foundations and campaign groups.
- On technical grounds, the court noted not every aircraft produces the same noise, so take-offs and landings as a counting method is inadequate, and the minister's noise-reduction proposals lack proper demonstration.
- Despite tearing up the overall cap, the reduction in night flights from 32,000 to 27,000 annually will remain in force because there were no objections to that part of the plan.
- Local and municipal officials argue airlines call the cap unacceptable, while surrounding councils and campaigners push for lower limits and Amsterdam officials want a 400,000 take-offs and landings target, night closures, and runway shutdowns to reduce noise and pollution.
14 Articles
14 Articles
In the Netherlands, the Supreme Court has overturned the flight restrictions at Amsterdam-Schiphol airport.
Schiphol: Minister Madlener set a maximum number of flights at Schiphol to limit noise pollution for local residents. But he can't…
Former Minister of Infrastructure and Water Management Barry Madlener failed to adequately explain why there is a limit on the number of aircraft allowed to take off and land at Schiphol Airport. The Council of State has ruled on this, thus overturning last year's air traffic decree. Madlener decided that, starting November 1, 2025, a maximum of 478,000 flights per year would be allowed from Schiphol Airport to reduce noise pollution in the surr…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 57% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium












