US Edition
DoorDash Seeks to Have Competition Bureau Case on Misleading Prices Dismissed
- At the Competition Tribunal, DoorDash Inc. asks to dismiss the case alleging it misled customers, opposing the Commissioner of Competition Matthew Boswell’s June application.
- Amid drip pricing allegations, Commissioner of Competition Matthew Boswell last month alleged DoorDash marketed lower prices than consumers paid, with fixed fees added at checkout.
- DoorDash contends its fees are prominently displayed on merchant store pages and at checkout, asserting none are unavoidable under the Competition Act.
- Pending the Tribunal’s decision, the Commissioner of Competition seeks penalties and restitution to customers, while DoorDash asserts it should face none.
- Looking beyond Canada, DoorDash asserts the Competition Act doesn’t require all-in prices, only sufficient information, and says it must pay nearly US$17-million to New York delivery workers.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
18 Articles
18 Articles
A complaint accuses the U.S. company of misleading Canadian consumers with its prices.
·Montreal, Canada
Read Full Article
DoorDash asks the Competition Tribunal to dismiss a complaint alleging that it misled Canadian consumers by announcing meal deliveries at a lower price than they actually pay.
·Montreal, Canada
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources18
Leaning Left10Leaning Right1Center2Last UpdatedBias Distribution77% Left
Bias Distribution
- 77% of the sources lean Left
77% Left
L 77%
15%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
