The main story in the case of the wiped dachshund in Teplice is complicated. The defendant lost a lawyer who refused to represent her. Before the trial, she expressed her wish to obtain a free attorney now. The court had planned to hear testimony on a key witness -- the defendant's infant nephew -- and possibly deliver a verdict. Instead, he had to adjourn the meeting in view of the circumstances.
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.
The main story in the case of the wiped dachshund in Teplice is complicated. The defendant lost a lawyer who refused to represent her. Before the trial, she expressed her wish to obtain a free attorney now. The court had planned to hear testimony on a key witness -- the defendant's infant nephew -- and possibly deliver a verdict. Instead, he had to adjourn the meeting in view of the circumstances.