Published • loading... • Updated
Court of Appeals of Indiana Finds Trial Judge Improperly Precluded Impeachment of Attorney Whose Deposition Was Introduced at Trial
Summary by LexBlog
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.1 Articles
1 Articles
Court of Appeals of Indiana Finds Trial Judge Improperly Precluded Impeachment of Attorney Whose Deposition Was Introduced at Trial
Similar to its federal counterpart, Indiana Rule of Evidence 806 provides that When a hearsay statement or a statement described in Rule 801 (d)(2)(C), (D), or (E) has been admitted in evidence, the declarant’s credibility may be attacked, and then supported, by any evidence that would be admissible for those purposes if the declarant had testified as a witness. The court may admit evidence of the declarant’s inconsistent statement or conduc…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources1
Leaning Left0Leaning Right0Center0Last UpdatedBias DistributionNo sources with tracked biases.
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
