institutional access

You are connecting from
Lake Geneva Public Library,
please login or register to take advantage of your institution's Ground News Plan.

Published loading...Updated

What Is the Controversial Definition of Antisemitism that Institutions Are Being Told to Adopt?

AUSTRALIA, JUL 15 – The government weighs adopting the IHRA definition amid concerns it may limit free speech and stifle criticism of Israel, with 39 universities already endorsing a related version.

  • In 2023, Australia's anti-Semitism envoy Jillian Segal released a report urging adoption of the IHRA definition to combat hatred against Jewish people.
  • The definition, drafted by Kenneth Stern, faces criticism for conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism and possibly stifling free speech.
  • Australian governments, including Albanese's Labor and the Morrison government, have endorsed the IHRA definition since 2021, while debate continues over its application.
  • Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke called the definition a useful tool against antisemitism but acknowledged Stern’s warning it could be weaponised and cautioned against free-speech framing.
  • The report recommends actions like creating a national antisemitic crimes database and funding cuts to institutions that fail to address antisemitism amid ongoing political debate.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?

12 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 44% of the sources lean Left
44% Left
Factuality

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

Australian Financial Review broke the news in Sydney, Australia on Tuesday, July 15, 2025.
Sources are mostly out of (0)

You have read 1 out of your 5 free daily articles.