Contract – Frustration of purpose – Pandemic
2 Articles
2 Articles
Contract – Frustration of purpose – Pandemic – Rhode Island Lawyers Weekly
Where (1) a plaintiff sued for the balance due on two contracts that the defendant cancelled during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) the defendant was awarded summary judgment on the ground that its performance of the contracts was excused as impracticable, a remand is necessary because of an unsettled factual dispute as to whether the doctrine of impracticability applies.
Contract – Frustration of purpose – Pandemic
Where (1) a plaintiff sued for the balance due on two contracts that the defendant cancelled during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2) the defendant was awarded summary judgment on the ground that its performance of the contracts was excused as impracticable, a remand is necessary because of an unsettled factual dispute as to whether the doctrine of impracticability applies.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium