US Edition
Companies Taking Concrete Steps Toward Capturing Revenues From Carbon Dioxide
CANADA, AUG 3 – Canadian firms develop carbon capture projects producing carbon-infused building materials and commercial products with production starting next spring, advancing emissions reduction efforts.
- Last week, Carbon Upcycling held a groundbreaking ceremony at the Ash Grove cement plant in Mississauga, Ont., for its commercial demonstration project, with production set to begin next spring.
- Foresight Canada notes that industry continues to favor underground storage, as a report last year concluded it is likely to beat out using carbon from large emitters.
- Industry observers note that CCUS has been framed as `one big silver bullet technology`, with cement contributing about eight per cent of global emissions, and CleanO2 captures CO2 from heating systems into pearl ash.
- According to industry analysis, carbon utilization’s economics remain uncertain in many cases, while Dave Sawyer noted it helps generate credits but plays a small role.
- Foresight Canada sees southwestern Ontario as a promising region due to emitter clusters and innovation hubs despite limited storage infrastructure, Apoorv Sinha said `What needs to happen is more support and a larger focus`.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
36 Articles
36 Articles
Breaking News, Sports, Manitoba, Canada
·Winnipeg, Canada
Read Full Article
It can be used to produce fuel, fertilizers, building materials and even hand soap, but can carbon dioxide also be cost-effective? Carbon capture has long been at the heart of Canada's efforts to reduce emissions. It involves capturing greenhouse gas from industrial sites and preventing it from becoming part of the atmosphere. Carbon is most often permanently stored underground. More rarely, CO2 is captured by changing its chemical properties an…
·Richelieu, Canada
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources36
Leaning Left20Leaning Right1Center3Last UpdatedBias Distribution83% Left
Bias Distribution
- 83% of the sources lean Left
83% Left
L 83%
13%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
