Amendment 83 Asks Colorado Voters to Make Hunting and Fishing a Constitutional Right

Vote no on Amendment 83 to keep hunting and fishing well-regulated (Editorial)

Amendment 83 would add the right to hunt and fish to the Colorado Constitution, but it would also limit Colorado Parks and Wildlife's ability to regulate hunting.

Colorado voters to decide whether hunting and fishing deserve constitutional protection - NEW YORK TIMES POST

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2026 FOX News Network, LLC. All rights reserved. Quotes displayed in real-time or delayed by at least 15 minutes. Market data provided by Factset. Powered and implemented by FactSet Digital Solutions. Legal Statement. Mutual Fund and ETF data provided by LSEG.

Colorado voters to decide whether hunting and fishing deserve constitutional protection

Colorado Amendment 83 would make hunting and fishing constitutional rights in the state. Existing wildlife management rules, bag limits and licensing would remain in place.

Amendment 83 asks Colorado voters to make hunting and fishing a constitutional right

Colorado's Amendment 83 asks voters to make hunting and fishing a constitutional right, sparking debate over ballot box biology and wildlife management.

Vote NO on Amendment 83: the sneaky power grab disguised as a "right to hunt and fish"

This week, we’re back to warn you about another bad idea headed for a statewide vote in Colorado this November: Amendment 83, the so-called “Constitutional Right to Hunt and Fish.” Click here to learn more about Amendment 83, and why you need to vote NO. In Colorado, we understand that managing our state’s wildlife and […]