The ecologist association claims its financial independence, without public subsidies or corporate money. But according to evidence revealed by L的Incorrect, its model, weakened by the decline of the collection and a social plan, raises a sensitive tax question: do its defiscalized donations finance first the defence of the environment or a political advocacy activity?
The ecologist association claims its financial independence, without public subsidies or corporate money. But according to evidence revealed by L的Incorrect, its model, weakened by the decline of the collection and a social plan, raises a sensitive tax question: do its defiscalized donations finance first the defence of the environment or a political advocacy activity?