CNN: Trump’s audacious bid to end birthright citizenship was not an entire loss at the Supreme Court
The 6-3 ruling said Congress would need a constitutional amendment to change birthright citizenship, even as Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh left a narrow opening.
- On June 30, the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship in a 6-3 decision, with Chief Justice John Roberts affirming the 14th Amendment guarantees citizenship to all born in the United States.
- Ratified in 1868, the 14th Amendment establishes citizenship for all persons born or naturalized in the United States. The majority affirmed this constitutional rule, closing the door on administrative attempts to bypass the framework.
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh concurred with the majority only in part, disagreeing that Trump's order violated the 14th Amendment. Legal expert Epps noted his separate opinion was "the only voice of the nine that raises that possibility" of legislative intervention.
- Shortly after the ruling, Trump urged Congress to pass legislation to end birthright citizenship, dismissing the need for a "long and unwieldy" constitutional amendment. Analysts warn any such attempt would likely be struck down by courts.
- The Center for Immigration Studies estimates birth tourism accounts for over 20,000 births annually in the United States. Critics like Lee argue the ruling upholds "cheap and cheated citizenship," though the Court maintained the established constitutional standard.
43 Articles
43 Articles
The Alinsky Type Conundrum of Trump v. Barbara » Sons of Liberty Media
Nothing says conundrum quite like the recent Supreme Court decision upholding the “plain text meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.” It was quite interesting as they issued their ruling supporting birthright citizenship on the same day they granted certiorari to two assault weapon ban cases. Needless to say, the gun rights supporters have been waiting a …
The Alinsky Type Conundrum of Trump v. Barbara
Nothing says conundrum quite like the recent Supreme Court decision upholding the “plain text meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment.” It was quite interesting as they issued their ruling supporting birthright citizenship on the same day they granted certiorari to two assault weapon ban cases. Needless to say, the gun rights supporters have been waiting a long time for the court to act on this issue. Ever since the Bruen decision, the court has bee…
Congress can still ban birthright citizenship: Here’s how * WorldNetDaily * by Josh Hammer
Source link The Supreme Court has committed a grievous moral and legal error in Trump v. Barbara, the landmark case on birthright citizenship. In holding that the 14th Amendment confers automatic citizenship on virtually all children born on American soil, the court has severely vitiated the sanctity of American citizenship – in this “America
US Supreme Court upholds birthright citizenship, rejecting Trump order
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday struck down President Donald Trump’s attempt to redefine the constitutional right to birthright citizenship. In the decision, a majority of the justices upheld the country’s long understanding of automatic citizenship by birth on American soil, regardless of the immigration status of a newborn’s parents. The majority opinion, written by […]
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 60% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
