US Edition[Opinion] Clarity Without Cure: The Supreme Court’s reinterpretation of Articles 200 and 201 and the future of federal governance
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.2 Articles
2 Articles
A Constitutional Reset on Governor Assent: The Supreme Court’s opinion in the presidential reference on Articles 200–201
In its significant opinion delivered under Article 143 of the Constitution, a Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai, also comprising Justice Surya Kant, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice PS Narasimha and Justice AS Chandurkar, substantially re-clarified the constitutional mechanics of assent to State bills, Governor discretion, and presidential review under Articles 200 and 201. Delivered in response to a Presidential Reference under Artic…
Clarity Without Cure: The Supreme Court’s reinterpretation of Articles 200 and 201 and the future of federal governance
In its significant opinion delivered under Article 143 of the Constitution, a Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice BR Gavai, also comprising Justice Surya Kant, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice PS Narasimha and Justice AS Chandurkar, substantially re-clarified the constitutional mechanics of assent to State bills, Governor discretion, and presidential review under Articles 200 and 201. Delivered in response to a Presidential Reference under Artic…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- There is no tracked Bias information for the sources covering this story.
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
