3 Articles
3 Articles
Justice Thomas Criticizes the Landmark LGBT+ Rights Case
Justice Clarence Thomas is very displeased with the landmark LGBTQ+ rights ruling because it was decided on the previous Bostock case and it’s “incorrect reasoning.” The case decided this week is US v. Schrmetti. It’s a landmark case which allows Tennessee to continue banning mutilation surgeries and puberty blockers for minors. However, the decision was […] The post Justice Thomas Criticizes the Landmark LGBT+ Rights Case appeared first on www.…
Clarence Thomas Knocks Landmark Supreme Court LGBTQ+ Ruling—'Incorrect'
Clarence Thomas criticized a landmark LGBTQ+ rights case as being decided based on "incorrect" reasoning in a new ruling issued on Wednesday.Newsweek reached out to the court for comment via its public information office email on Wednesday.The Supreme Court has considerable authority to interpret the laws of the United States, and its recent rulings had extensive impact on key policies around LGBTQ+ rights. Thomas, viewed as among the court's mo…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 33% of the sources lean Left, 33% of the sources are Center, 33% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium