Published • loading... • Updated
Tatum Denies He Is Behind Instagram Burner Account
The actor said he has only one Instagram account as speculation spread over a burner profile that posted about Zoë Kravitz and Harry Styles.
- On Monday, Channing Tatum addressed online speculation that he operated an anonymous Instagram account called 'Nonya Bidness,' dismissing the rumors as 'f****** hilarious' on his Instagram Story.
- Speculation began last week after fans noticed the 'Nonya Bidness' account, which commented on Channing's ex-fiancée Zoe Kravitz and her husband-to-be Harry Styles, had only one follower: the actor's verified Instagram account.
- The account circulated commentary regarding Kravitz and Styles, who were reported to be engaged in April 2026, including one post stating, 'Just here for the hate.'
- Tatum questioned the logic of the theory, stating, 'Also why would I follow a burner account if I didn't want people to connect me to it?' The account has since gone dark.
- Although archived history suggested the profile may have been a fan page, no independent confirmation exists regarding who actually operated the account.
Insights by Ground AI
Podcasts & Opinions
47 Articles
47 Articles
The actor wanted to put an end to the theories about his secret profile to make sarcastic comments about Zoë Kravitz and his current fiancé, Harry Styles, who have gone viral for days
·Madrid, Spain
Read Full Article
The Mercury newsReposted by 
NY Daily News
NY Daily NewsChanning Tatum addresses rumors he has burner account to troll ex Zoe Kravitz
Channing Tatum has addressed a viral rumor suggesting he's been using a burner account to troll his ex, Zoë Kravitz, and her current fiancé, Harry Styles.
·San Jose, United States
Read Full Article
The Magic Mike star has been embroiled in an extremely embarrassing Instagram scandal. Channing Tatum was accused of criticizing his exes on a fake profile.
·Budapest, Hungary
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources47
Leaning Left13Leaning Right7Center11Last UpdatedBias Distribution42% Left
Bias Distribution
- 42% of the sources lean Left
42% Left
L 42%
C 35%
R 23%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
