Jonathan Turley Details ‘Pretty Hot Argument’ Over Nationwide Injunctions At Supreme Court
- The Supreme Court is reviewing Trump v. CASA, a case challenging a 2024 executive order that seeks to eliminate automatic U.S. Citizenship for children born in the country to parents without legal status, originally filed in a federal court in New Hampshire.
- This lawsuit arose amid numerous challenges to Trump administration policies that triggered dozens of nationwide injunctions blocking policy enforcement across the country.
- Nationwide injunctions have allowed single judges in various districts, including Maryland and Massachusetts, to pause the birthright citizenship order and other policies, raising concerns about judges effectively setting national policy.
- Juan Proao of LULAC highlighted that no previous president has issued such a high volume of executive orders—exceeding 150—within a brief period, while opponents contend that seeking favorable courts through forum shopping damages the credibility of the judicial system.
- A Supreme Court decision narrowing the use of nationwide injunctions could reshape federal court power and affect how future federal policies are challenged or upheld nationwide.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
11 Articles
11 Articles
All
Left
1
Center
2
Right
8
Jonathan Turley Reports "Hot" Supreme Court Arguments Over Nationwide Injunctions In Trump Birthright Case
Oral arguments at the Supreme Court on Thursday regarding the use of nationwide injunctions became "pretty hot," according to George Washington University law
·Tampa, United States
Read Full Article

Jonathan Turley Details ‘Pretty Hot Argument’ Over Nationwide Injunctions At Supreme Court
GWU law professor Jonathan Turley told Fox News host Harris Faulkner that oral arguments at the Supreme Court over nationwide injunctions got “pretty hot.”
·Washington, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources11
Leaning Left1Leaning Right8Center2Last UpdatedBias Distribution73% Right
Bias Distribution
- 73% of the sources lean Right
73% Right
C 18%
R 73%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage