US Edition
Barrett, Jackson spar in birthright citizenship case opinions
UNITED STATES, JUN 28 – The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to restrict federal judges from issuing nationwide injunctions, limiting judicial power over executive actions including Trump’s birthright citizenship order.
- On Friday, June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court delivered a 6-3 decision in Trump v. CASA that restricted the ability of federal judges to block executive actions on a nationwide scale through injunctions.
- The dispute originated from President Trump’s executive directive seeking to revoke automatic citizenship for individuals born on U.S. soil to parents without legal status, a move that was halted by lower courts for being unconstitutional.
- Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion that limited the scope of injunction powers and thoroughly rejected the arguments presented in Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s dissent, which advocated for a universal judicial requirement that the Executive branch must comply with the law.
- Barrett acknowledged that it is accepted that the Executive Branch is obligated to comply with the law, but she emphasized that the Judiciary does not possess unlimited authority to enforce this duty, challenging Jackson’s view that such compliance should be universally ensured.
- The ruling restricts judges' ability to block presidential actions nationwide, which Jackson warned risks weakening constitutional principles by emboldening executive overreach.
55 Articles
55 Articles
Justice Barrett Exposes Justice Jackson's Stupid Dissent
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett launched a takedown of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s “extreme” dissent in the landmark birthright citizenship case. It mostly eliminates nationwide injunctions, the NY Post reports. Brown Jackson’s writing is very poor and inappropriately informal. She used expressions like “full stop” in the formal document, as well as phrases like, […] The post Justice Barrett Exposes Justice Jackson’s Stupid Dissent a…
sgtreport.com
PJ MediaAmy Coney Barrett Utterly Humiliated Ketanji Brown Jackson
by Matt Margolis, PJ Media: Justice Amy Coney Barrett has gotten a bad rap lately for siding with the leftist wing of the Supreme Court on a few cases, but if you ever needed a reminder of why ACB was such a pivotal addition to the Supreme Court, look no further than her latest majority […]
Justice Barrett Torches Justice Jackson In Case’s Majority Ruling ⋆ Conservative Firing Line
The following article, Justice Barrett Torches Justice Jackson In Case’s Majority Ruling, was first published on Conservative Firing Line. Genteel. Restrained. Those descriptives often are applicable in Supreme Court opinions when factions, a majority and a dissent, disagree. It sometimes moves toward the critical, such as when Chief Justice John Roberts and others, disagreeing with the leftist majority at that time that fabricated out of nothin…
The Spectator World
Real Clear PoliticsAmy Coney Barrett v. Ketanji Brown Jackson
The Supreme Court has reigned in the authority of district court judges by ruling unconstitutional the ever more common practice of universal injunctions, an abuse of Article III power that cried out for the Court’s intervention. Trump v. Casa is a long overdue vindication of the limits of constitutional power. Sadly, yet increasingly predictably, some progressives claimed the end was nigh… again. In dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s word…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 59% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
