Peter Briggs argues that Pillar 1 cannot deliver on schedule or budget, and that Australia should pause its High-ENriched Uranium pathway and assess proven Low-Enriched Uranium alternatives. A central question now confronts Australian defence policymakers and the public alike: Is it too late to change course? When pressed on whether AUKUS Pillar 1 can realistically deliver […]
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.