Attorney Would Have Saturated System with 38,000 Writings in Hours: Judges Want to Veto AI in Court
4 Articles
4 Articles
According to the committee of civil magistrates, the activity involved collapsing with 500 or 900 documents per court, an unprecedented fact that was described as a "procedural abuse." The plenary of the highest court saw the matter on Tuesday and asked the Department of Informatics of the CAPJ for a report.
Artificial intelligence promised to save time. In the civil courts, at least according to a committee of judges, it ended up generating the exact opposite: an avalanche of almost 40,000 writings entered in just two days that now led to request the Supreme Court to prohibit its use for this type of procedure. The post Lawyer saturated system with 38,000 writings in hours and now judges want to veto the AI in courts appeared first on BioBioChile.
The Committee of Civil Judges requested the highest court to prohibit the use of artificial intelligence until there is an institutional policy in this area.
The Committee of Civil Judges of Santiago served the Supreme Court by denouncing an “abuse” of technological tools by a lawyer who saturated the system. The avalanche of automated presentations, which sought to process massive waivers of sponsorship, collapsed the technical and human capacity of the courts, opening an urgent debate on the regulation of robots in the Virtual Judicial Office. What seemed to be a promise of technological efficiency…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
