Published • loading... • Updated
Send the arXiv AI-Generated Slop, Get a Yearlong Vacation From Submissions
The new rule targets fake citations, unedited prompts and other AI-generated slop that editors say has slipped into scholarly submissions.
- Thomas Dietterich, chair of arXiv's computer science section, announced Thursday that authors submitting AI-generated content with "incontrovertible evidence" of neglect face a 1-year ban and mandatory future peer review.
- This crackdown targets rising academic AI misuse, evidenced by recent data from the 2026 International Conference on Learning Representations where 21% of peer reviews were allegedly fully AI-generated.
- Dietterich, an Oregon State University professor, specified that evidence includes "hallucinated references" or "meta-comments from the LLM." Authors must take "full responsibility" for content, regardless of how it was generated.
- Moderators and section chairs must confirm evidence before imposing penalties, though authors may appeal decisions. Meta researcher Lucas Beyer called the move "very good," urging restrictions be "strongly enforced."
- After more than 20 years hosted by Cornell, arXiv is transitioning to an independent nonprofit to better manage its repository, which reached two million submissions by the end of 2021.
Insights by Ground AI
13 Articles
13 Articles
TechCrunchReposted by 
New Movies & TV Shows, Trailers & Reviews
New Movies & TV Shows, Trailers & ReviewsResearch repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work
ArXiv is doing more to crack down on the careless use of large language models in scientific papers.
·United States
Read Full Article
ArXiv to Ban Authors for One Year if They Submit AI-Generated Papers Without Human Review
BitcoinWorld ArXiv to Ban Authors for One Year if They Submit AI-Generated Papers Without Human Review ArXiv, the widely used open-access repository for preprint research, has announced a new policy that could result in a one-year ban for authors who submit papers containing clear evidence of unchec...
Coverage Details
Total News Sources13
Leaning Left2Leaning Right0Center2Last UpdatedBias Distribution50% Left, 50% Center
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources lean Left, 50% of the sources are Center
50% Center
L 50%
C 50%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
