US Edition
Gorsuch asks Sauer if Native Americans are birthright citizens
Justices pressed the administration on whether its domicile test would exclude children of tribal members and other U.S.-born citizens, with Trump watching from the front row.
- President Donald Trump attended Supreme Court arguments on Wednesday as Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued the 14th Amendment does not apply to children of undocumented immigrants or temporary visa holders.
- Sauer argued the 1898 Wong Kim Ark precedent should be narrowly interpreted, claiming it grants citizenship only to children of lawful permanent residents, not temporary visitors or undocumented immigrants.
- Justice Neil Gorsuch pressed Sauer on whether Native Americans are birthright citizens under his domicile test. "I think so, on our test, if they're lawfully domiciled here," Sauer responded, audibly thrown off.
- Following the arguments, Trump took to Truth Social to declare, "We are the only Country in the World STUPID enough to allow Birthright Citizenship!" criticizing the existing framework.
- Chief Justice John Roberts called the government's supporting examples "very quirky," while Justice Amy Coney Barrett warned reinterpreting the 14th Amendment could prove "messy" in application.
13 Articles
13 Articles
Solicitor General Sparks Alarm After Telling Supreme Court He's 'Not Sure' If Native Americans Are Birthright Citizens
The relationship between Indigenous American nations and the colonizers and settlers who arrived and established the United States is complicated. Indigenous peoples were integral parts of the survival and success of early colonizers. The Haudenosaunee Confederacy offered a blueprint for the United States Constitution and the structure of the federal government including the three independent branches offering checks and balances, ideally.Indige…
Trump Lawyer Struggles with Supreme Court's Question About Whether Native Americans Are Birthright Citizens: 'Uh, I Think So?'
The justices appeared largely unmoved by the government's argument that President Donald Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship does not violate the Constitution Credit: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc/Getty;OLIVIER DOULIERY/AFP/GettyNEED TO KNOWSolicitor General D. John Sauer struggled to say during arguments before the Supreme Court on Wednesday, April 1, whether Native Americans are birthright citizens under President Donald Tru…
‘Is he a DEI hire?’: Trump solicitor general savaged after muffing birthright citizenship question
Donald Trump’s solicitor general is being savaged online after he was flustered by a basic question Wednesday from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch during oral arguments on the president’s executive order to end birthright citizenship.
Gorsuch asks Sauer if Native Americans are birthright citizens
Solicitor General D. John Sauer was pressed by Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch on whether Native Americans should be considered birthright citizens, and after some hesitation, he answered in the affirmative, citing the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924.
NEWS HEADLINES: Solicitor General John Sauer Schools Justice Jackson In Oral Arguments * 100PercentFedUp.com * by Noah
John Sauer, serving as Solicitor General for the Justice Department, stood before the Supreme Court on Wednesday to present arguments in support of President Trump’s executive order concerning birthright citizenship. That same morning, the President himself was present during the Court’s oral arguments. From the reactions on the bench, most of the justices seemed unconvinced by the administration’s effort to eliminate birthright citizenship. The…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 60% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
