Are Local Officials Duty-Bound to Certify Elections? Arizona Ruling Creates New Doubt
- Two Republican supervisors in Cochise County postponed certifying the 2022 election results but were compelled by a court order to finalize the certification in accordance with Arizona's election manual.
- The delay and ensuing dispute occurred against the backdrop of a longstanding assumption in Arizona that election supervisors lack discretion in certifying results, a notion recently disputed by a court decision.
- Attorney General Mark Brnovich reported systemic issues with early ballot handling in 2020, noting an overwhelming volume of ballots and insufficient signature verification time, despite no proof of rigged results.
- Brnovich highlighted that on November 4, 2020, 206,648 signatures were verified at 4.6 seconds each, calling the process vulnerable to error and proposing stronger penalties and new election procedures.
- The dispute over certification duties implicates election integrity and political influence, with legal charges against the supervisors and legislative responses pending.
14 Articles
14 Articles
Are local officials duty-bound to certify elections? Arizona ruling creates new doubt | News Channel 3-12
Are local officials duty-bound to certify elections? Arizona ruling creates new doubt When two Republican Cochise County supervisors delayed their certification of the county’s 2022 election results, a judge forced them to certify, pointing to language in Arizona’s election manual that says they have no choice. A state grand jury later charged the two supervisors with two felonies—conspiracy, and interference with the secretary of state’s duty t…

Are local officials duty-bound to certify elections? Arizona ruling creates new doubt
Votebeat reports that a recent court ruling challenges the long-held presumption in Arizona that supervisors have no discretion when certifying election results.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium