US Court Clears Way for Apple App Store Proceedings To Continue In Ongoing Epic Games Dispute – Channelnews
10 Articles
10 Articles
(Seoul = Yonhap News) Reporter Joo Jong-guk = Apple asked the U.S. Supreme Court to temporarily suspend judicial proceedings regarding the App Store fee dispute, but was denied.
US Court Clears Way for Apple App Store Proceedings To Continue In Ongoing Epic Games Dispute – channelnews
Apple’s App Store business model is facing another major legal challenge, with the US Supreme Court clearing the way for a lower-court process that could determine how much Apple is allowed to charge developers on purchases made outside its App Store payment system. The dispute stems from the long-running Apple v Epic Games battle. A US judge ordered Apple to allow developers to direct customers to alternative payment options, after finding Apple had not complied with an earlier injunction. Apple had sought to pause the latest proceedings while it pursues its appeal before the Supreme Court. The court initially granted a brief administrative stay, but subsequently rejected Apple’s bid for a longer pause, allowing the commission-rate proceedings to continue. The battle centres around the question of how much Apple can charge when it is not processing the payment itself. Apple has proposed a commission of up to 15% for standard apps, 10% for some specialised programs and subscription renewals, and 5% for developers eligible for its Small Business Program. Apple’s standard App Store commission has historically been 30%, with a reduced 15% rate applying to some developers and transactions. Epic Games is challenging Apple’s proposed fees, arguing they go beyond what the court allows for purchases made through alternative payment systems. The eventual ruling could affect the overall economics of app stores. For consumers, the App Store commissions are a cost that developers will either have to absorb or pass on. And a lower fee could give developers more room to cut prices, invest in their products or improve their own margins. Meanwhile, Apple is fighting hard as the App Store is a crucial part of the company’s services business. Changing the commission model could have implications for its revenue and for the way it controls transactions across the iPhone ecosystem. Apple argues its fees reflect the value of its distribution platform, technology and services.
Supreme Court denies yet another stay in Apple vs Epic proceedings as deadlines loom
Apple is expected to deliver its plan for how to charge App Store commissions under the single victory in the Epic lawsuit, and its last-ditch effort to avoid that has fallen through.Apple loses yet another appeal with the Supreme CourtThe Supreme Court and US District Court are dealing with the Apple vs Epic case simultaneously. The Supreme Court is set to weigh an appeal from Apple in October, while the District Court seeks to move forward wit…
Apple App Store Commission-Rate Proceedings Can Move Forward
Apple Inc. must take part in a lower court proceeding over the rate it charges developers for sales outside its App Store after the Supreme Court rejected a bid by the iPhone-maker to pause all further action in the case.
Judge Denies Apple's Attempt to Delay App Store Fee Proceedings in Epic Case
While Epic might not have handed Apple a resounding defeat in their legal battle against each other, it did result in Apple being forced to make some changes. This includes allowing developers to use alternative payment methods that bypass Apple’s App Store. Apple has since filed a motion to pause the proceedings that would have otherwise determined what fees, if any, could be charged on these purchases outside the App Store. Unfortunately for A…
Apple wins temporary U.S. Supreme Court pause in Epic Games App Store battle
U.S. Supreme Court The U.S. Supreme Court granted Apple a short-term halt in its ongoing antitrust fight with Epic Games on Wednesday, pausing lower-court proceedings for at least one day. Justice Elena Kagan issued an administrative stay that temporarily freezes action in a California trial court. The order gives the high court additional time to review Apple's request for a longer pause on further lower-court steps in the long-running dispute …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 75% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium







