Law firms urge appeals court to keep blocking Trump’s sanctions against them
The firms argue the orders retaliate for legal work and client ties, while the Justice Department says Trump can control clearances and building access.
- On Thursday, a three-judge panel of the District of Columbia Circuit Court heard arguments challenging President Donald Trump's executive orders targeting four major law firms.
- Trump sanctioned WilmerHale, Jenner and Block, Perkins Coie, and Susman Godfrey for employing lawyers associated with the Russia probe or the Democratic National Committee, revoking security clearances and barring federal building access.
- Deputy Associate Attorney General Abhishek Kambli argued the administration maintains authority over security clearances, while Solicitor General Paul Clement contended the orders violate the First Amendment by punishing lawyers for zealous representation.
- Although lower courts previously blocked enforcement of these executive orders, the appellate panel did not immediately issue a ruling following Thursday's two-hour hearing.
32 Articles
32 Articles
Columbus Telegram
News & RecordAppeals court skeptical of law firm punishment
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's administration faced a skeptical federal appeals court Thursday in its bid to revive the Republican leader's executive orders punishing four major U.S. law firms, testing the scope of presidential power after judges in Washington rejected…
Trump's DOJ just opened the door to Dem retaliation
President Donald Trump’s Justice Department (DOJ) is asking the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to allow it to take security clearances away from law firms that accept cases with which they disagree — even though that same precedent could empower future Democratic presidents to persecute Republican law firms.“The DOJ returned to court Thursday and told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit that President…
The Trump Administration's Best Argument For Its Biglaw EOs Is That You Just Have To Trust The President
Oral argument in the consolidated Biglaw executive order cases was today, and if you were hoping the Trump administration had found a more constitutionally defensible position since its previous defense these orders — which has lost, four times, before four different judges across the ideological spectrum — well, I have some news for you. The DOJ’s position, as articulated by government attorney Abhishek Kambli before Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan …
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 50% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
