Appeals court rules key Alien Enemies Act lawsuit moot
The ruling leaves unresolved whether the Alien Enemies Act can be used for peacetime deportations after all three plaintiffs were removed under other laws.
- On Thursday, the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed W.M.M. v. Trump as moot after the administration deported all three named plaintiffs using separate legal authorities.
- The litigation challenged President Donald Trump's use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to deport alleged Venezuelan members of the Tren de Aragua gang, a statute permitting deportation only during declared wars or an 'invasion' or 'predatory incursion.'
- During en banc oral arguments, Department of Justice attorney Drew Ensign admitted the administration's broad interpretation could theoretically allow the president to invoke the act against the 'British Invasion' of rock stars like The Beatles.
- The dismissal presumably vacates the earlier panel opinion that had ruled the administration's use of the act illegal, leaving the central legal question regarding executive authority unresolved.
- Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod characterized the deportations as rendering the case moot, while Judge James Ho argued in concurrence that the court should have decided the merits and that the president deserves absolute deference when determining an 'invasion' has occurred.
38 Articles
38 Articles
A federal court of appeals dismissed on Thursday, August 13, a key lawsuit against President Donald Trump's use of the Foreign Enemies Act of 1798, unsolved if that invocation was legal.The decision leaves unanswered the central question of the case, which has been in dispute for more than a year.The Fifth Circuit of Appeals, based in New Orleans, dismissed the case because the government had already deported the three Venezuelan plaintiffs on o…
The Toronto Star
Appeals court sides with Trump in fight over subpoena of gender-affirming care provider
President Donald Trump's goal of ending gender-affirming care is not improper and cannot be the basis for quashing a subpoena issued by the Justice Department against a provider of medical
Lewiston Sun Journal
New England appeals court upholds decision granting immigrants the right to bond hearings
The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's decision, finding the federal government was misinterpreting immigration law.
The decision avoids resolving whether Trump can apply a 1798 war law to expel Venezuelans accused of belonging to gangs
Appeals Court Sidesteps Ruling on Legality of Trump’s Alien Enemies Act Invocation
A federal appeals court on Aug. 13 dismissed a major challenge to President Donald Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, ruling that the appeal had become moot after the government deported the three plaintiffs using ordinary immigration law. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision effectively ducked the core legal question. By dismissing the appeal as moot, or legally irrelevant, on procedural grounds, the court avoided rulin…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 55% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
