Angel Reese Apologizes for Critical Comments of Chicago Sky’s Season
Angel Reese expressed frustration with the Chicago Sky's poor 9-30 record and urged the team to acquire experienced players to improve future prospects, apologizing for any offense caused.
- On Wednesday, Angel Reese criticized the Chicago Sky in an interview with the Chicago Tribune, saying she doesn't believe Hailey Van Lith or Rachel Banham can lead a playoff team, prompting teammates to demand a meeting.
- The Sky have struggled this season, entering Wednesday with a 9-30 record and, after moving to 10-30, were eliminated from the playoffs for a second consecutive year.
- In Wednesday's 88-64 victory, Angel Reese finished with 18 points and 13 rebounds, leading the team with averages of 14.7 points and 12.6 rebounds this season.
- After the controversy, Reese apologized to Chicago Sky teammates Wednesday and faces possible suspension for Friday's game versus Indiana Fever after her eighth technical foul; an internal meeting is expected.
- This offseason, Reese said the Chicago Sky front office must be aggressive in free agency as she plans to help attract top talent but warned she might seek other opportunities if the roster doesn't improve this year.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
14 Articles
14 Articles


Angel Reese apologizes for 'misconstrued' comments: 'Didn't intentionally mean to put down my teammates'
Chicago Sky star Angel Reese says she has apologized to her teammates for an article in which she criticized the organization and indicated she might eventually leave the team.
·Los Angeles, United States
Read Full ArticleAngel Reese apologizes for critical comments of Chicago Sky’s season
Chicago Sky star Angel Reese apologized Wednesday for comments she made to the Chicago Tribune which appeared to criticize some of her teammates, coaches and team officials for not building a competitive squad.
·Atlanta, United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources14
Leaning Left6Leaning Right1Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution55% Left
Bias Distribution
- 55% of the sources lean Left
55% Left
L 55%
C 36%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium