US EditionConservatives fume over the Justice Barrett siding against Trump on foreign aid freeze
- Amy Coney Barrett sided with John Roberts and three liberal justices to require the Trump administration to pay nearly $2 billion in foreign aid reimbursements, countering the administration's efforts to freeze these payments.
- Barrett faces backlash from conservative groups after this decision, but she has historically supported significant conservative causes, according to Ed Whelan, a conservative lawyer.
- Critics, including Jack Posobiec, labeled Barrett as a disappointment, arguing that her vote reflects deeper issues regarding Republican commitments to certain values, while other conservatives defended her track record.
- The Supreme Court's ruling reinforces the tension within conservative circles over foreign aid, prompting some to question Barrett's alignment with Trump's agenda.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
55 Articles
55 Articles
All
Left
20
Center
10
Right
11
SCOTUS Has Passed Its First Test (Barely) — But The Harder Ones Are Coming Fast
Hello, it’s the weekend. This is The Weekender ☕️ President Trump’s attempt to unilaterally withhold foreign aid. That’s $2 billion that had not only already been allocated by Congress, but the work for which had already been completed; the plaintiffs were literally asking the government to pay its bills. It was an easy case, but a big test nonetheless; if the Supreme Court greenlit that hokum, what wouldn’t they allow? Justice Samuel Alito wro…
·United States
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources55
Leaning Left20Leaning Right11Center10Last UpdatedBias Distribution49% Left
Bias Distribution
- 49% of the sources lean Left
49% Left
L 49%
C 24%
R 27%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
