Published 1 month ago • loading... • Updated 1 month ago
All religious practices presumed protected unless they violate public order, health, morality: Centre in Sabarimala review hearing
The government said challengers must prove a breach, while the court said caste-based exclusion cannot be justified as religion.
Summary by The Hindu
2 Articles
2 Articles
Sabarimala Reference: ‘Constitution entrusts religious reform to legislature not courts’
These submissions are part of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s rejoinder to the arguments made by parties defending the SC intervention in allowing women to enter the Sabarimala temple.
All religious practices presumed protected unless they violate public order, health, morality: Centre in Sabarimala review hearing
Centre argues that “essential religious practices” absent in the Constitutional text, is only part of SC interpretation; says individual freedom of conscience (Article 25) linked to denominational rights (Article 26)

Father's Day SaleGet 40% off Vantage subscriptions for yourself or a friend.Get Started
Coverage Details
Total News Sources2
Leaning Left2Leaning Right0Center0Last Updated100% Left
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Left
100% Left
L 100%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium


