Alito appears testy during Sotomayor’s asylum dissent reading from the bench
Alito said he would have explained more after a dissent from the bench, as the court issued 6-3 immigration rulings.
- On Thursday, Justice Samuel Alito accused Justice Sonia Sotomayor of blindsiding him during Supreme Court immigration rulings, creating a rare public clash between the justices on the bench.
- Tensions peaked when Sotomayor read a lengthy dissent challenging the interpretation of 'arriving' in the United States, while Alito announced a 6-3 ruling restricting federal Temporary Protected Status for migrants from Haiti and Syria.
- Invoking the 1939 voyage of 937 Jewish refugees aboard the M.S. Louis, Sotomayor argued the ruling betrayed asylum law's protective legacy, while Alito countered that blocking asylum seekers was 'perfectly legitimate' for the administration.
- Alito stated from the bench that he would have written more had he known about the dissent beforehand, while Justice Elena Kagan chose not to read her own dissent, likely avoiding further confrontation.
- The confrontation underscores deepening ideological divisions within the Supreme Court, exemplified by Justice Amy Coney Barrett's exasperation at Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's dissent in a separate injunctions case earlier this term.
54 Articles
54 Articles
Angry Spat between Justices Alito And Sotomayor Was Result of a ‘Misunderstanding,’ CNN Reports
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite The Supreme Court downplayed the angry, very public spat that erupted between Justices Samuel Alito and Sonya Sotomayor this week as nothing more than a “misunderstanding” by the conservative, according to CNN. The unusual exchange between the two justices played out Thursday as the Supreme Court handed down a number of decisions, including one involving asylum at the Southern Border. Alito had written the majority o…
Associated Press News
Disagreements between Supreme Court justices bubble into public view as major rulings loom
Tensions are evident in a rare display among the Supreme Court justices at the end of the term. On Thursday, conservative Justice Samuel Alito read a majority ruling limiting asylum claims at the southern border.
‘Highly unusual’: Justice Alito gives impromptu rebuke to Sotomayor’s public dissent on asylum
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito surprised the court Thursday by publicly rebuking fellow Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The rebuke happened after the court ruled in Mullin v. Al […]
‘Highly unusual’: Justice Alito gives impromptu rebuke to Sotomayor’s public dissent on asylum · American Wire News
Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito surprised the court Thursday by publicly rebuking fellow Justice Sonia Sotomayor. The rebuke happened after the court ruled in Mullin v. Al Otro Lado by decreeing that a migrant seeking asylum in the United States isn’t entitled to have their case heard if they apply from Mexico, according to SCOTUSblog. BREAKING: Supreme Court rules for Trump on border turnback policy, holding that a migrant stopped on the Me…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 40% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
