In a professional injury insurance judgment at the Vestoppland and Valdres District Court, a wording has crept in that was probably not intended to be there. For in the judgment where a plaintiff had been exposed to a work accident in the form of a harmful current flow during work, which the plaintiff also won against the insurance company his company used, the author of […]
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.
In a professional injury insurance judgment at the Vestoppland and Valdres District Court, a wording has crept in that was probably not intended to be there. For in the judgment where a plaintiff had been exposed to a work accident in the form of a harmful current flow during work, which the plaintiff also won against the insurance company his company used, the author of […]