The Court Defended Its Ruling on Land Law and Said: “Disqualification and Hatred only Deteriorate Institutions and Democracy”
10 Articles
10 Articles
The highest court issued a statement to the “public opinion” in which it held that its sentence was limited to deciding a procedural issue and warned that it did not close the doors to other possible claims against UND 70/2023 de Milei
On Thursday, the country's highest court issued a statement justifying its decision, which gave effect to the government's decree to allow foreign investors to acquire land without limits.
The highest court held that the judgment in the CECIM case resolved a procedural issue and did not define the constitutionality of the land regime. The post The Supreme Court clarified its ruling on the Land Law and pointed to the “hate speech” appeared first on The Intransigent: Latest news from Argentina and the world in real time.
In an informal communication, spokespersons for the court issued a message to try to “clear doubts” about his sentence and remarked that in the case “only one procedural aspect was decided.” They argued that it does not affect other precautionary measures. The Court gave Milei the reason with the Land Law, but in the Rosada House no one celebrates The Supreme Court sought to clarify, through a message by WhatsApp issued by its spokesmen, the gro…
The highest court explained that its ruling in the CECIM case was limited to a procedural issue and that it does not affect other precautionary measures or anticipate a definition of the rural land regime.
Following criticism by the opposition and Malvinas ex-combatants, the highest court held that it did not rule on the validity of article 154 of DNU 70/2023 or on the validity of law 26.737. Read more
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
