US Edition
Engagement Joy: Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift in Celebration Mode
The antique yellow gold ring features a rare, estimated 8-10 carat old mine diamond valued up to $1 million, designed by Artifex Fine Jewelry to reflect unique craftsmanship and history.
- On Tuesday, Taylor Swift and Kansas City Chiefs star Travis Kelce announced their engagement in a joint Instagram post, with Ed Kelce revealing the proposal occurred almost two weeks earlier in Lee's Summit, Missouri.
- Kelce reportedly chose the ring almost entirely himself and worked with Kindred Lubeck of Artifex Fine Jewelry, drawing encouragement from Kindred Lubeck and Scott Swift after dating since 2023.
- The ring itself combines an antique cut, with experts Tobias Kormind and Lisa Levinson estimating the stone at eight to 10 carats and valuing it between $400,000 and $600,000.
- Swifties and jewelers are already responding, with bespoke jewelry services offering 8 carat elongated cushion-cut diamonds set in rose gold at about 500,000, while yellow gold sees a major comeback.
- Observers say the ring's story and provenance could influence broad bridal market and trend forecasters, as the antique diamond likely dates to more than 100 years ago, adding rarity and provenance.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
31 Articles
31 Articles
Taylor Swift’s diamond bears a resemblance to Princess Eugenie’s engagement ring
Taylor Swift has shared photographs of her stunning engagement ring, which bears a similarity to the piece worn by Princess Eugenie.The singer confirmed her engagement to American football player Travis Kelce in a social media post that featured her new jewellery. Speaking about the ring, Zack Stone from UK jeweller Steven Stone said: "Many celebrities prefer to keep their engagement rings private, which is why it was such a delightful surprise …
·London, United Kingdom
Read Full Article
Coverage Details
Total News Sources31
Leaning Left2Leaning Right6Center7Last UpdatedBias Distribution47% Center
Bias Distribution
- 47% of the sources are Center
47% Center
13%
C 47%
R 40%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
