US Edition
9th Circuit affirms San Diego judge’s ruling that California’s ‘one-gun-a-month’ law is unconstitutional
- On June 20, 2025, a federal appeals panel upheld a San Diego judge’s decision declaring California’s restriction limiting gun purchases to one per month unconstitutional.
- The law, which limited residents to one firearm purchase every 30 days, was challenged by gun owners, advocacy groups, and dealers citing infringement of Second Amendment rights under the 2022 Bruen ruling.
- Judge William Hayes and the 9th Circuit panel found no historical precedent for such a restriction and ruled that temporally limiting gun purchases unlawfully restrains constitutional rights.
- The majority opinion emphasized that there is no precedent for the government to limit the timing of exercising constitutional rights in this way. Brandon Combs, president of the organization involved, highlighted that the ruling affirms individuals cannot face arbitrary restrictions on how many firearms they may purchase at once.
- As a result, California residents can now purchase firearms more frequently, while the state considers appealing the ruling or seeking further review.
33 Articles
33 Articles
Ninth Circuit Strikes Down California’s One-Gun-A-Month Law
A federal appeals court just found a one-gun-a-month restriction violates the Second Amendment. On Friday, a unanimous three-judge panel on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California’s one-gun-a-month law is facially unconstitutional. It rejected the argument that America’s historic laws justify the 30-day restrictions on firearm purchases. Instead, the panel found that limiting… Source
Ninth Circuit Panel: California’s One-Gun-a-Month Law Unconstitutional
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled California’s one-gun-per-month law is unconstitutional because it violates the Second Amendment. iStock-697763642 A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Friday that California’s one-gun-per-month restriction violates the Second Amendment of the Constitution. The ruling was authored by Circuit Judge Danielle J. Forrest, a Donald Trump appointee. A concurring opinion w…
California’s ‘One Gun a Month’ Law is Unconstitutional, Court Affirms
California’s “one-gun-a-month” law violates the Second Amendment, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled June 20, affirming a lower court’s decision. “The panel held that California’s law is facially unconstitutional because the plain text of the Second Amendment protects the possession of multiple firearms and protects against meaningful constraints on the acquisition of firearms through purchase,” wrote Circuit Judge Danielle Forrest in the op…
Federal Appeals Court Cancels California’s ‘Gun Rationing’ Law
Democrat-controlled California, like Illinois and a handful of other deep blue states, has some of the most ridiculous gun laws in America. The post Federal Appeals Court Cancels California’s ‘Gun Rationing’ Law appeared first on Slay News.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 73% of the sources lean Right
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
