Supreme Court leans toward upholding federal internet subsidy program
- The Supreme Court showed support for an $8 billion subsidy aimed at expanding internet access in rural areas, despite a challenge against the funding's constitutionality from a conservative group claiming it violates separation of powers principles.
- Justices from both the conservative and liberal wings raised concerns that a ruling could disrupt the operational structures of federal agencies like the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
- The case arose from a Biden administration appeal following a ruling from the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals that invalidated the funding mechanism, which was created to help low-income communities access telecommunications.
- Justice Elena Kagan emphasized that rural areas should receive services that urban areas take for granted, highlighting the need for universal access to telecommunications.
51 Articles
51 Articles
Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Tax on Telephone Service
The U.S. Supreme Court on March 26 considered whether it should uphold a lower court ruling that invalidated an $8-billion-a-year broadband subsidy for rural and low-income regions. The case is actually two cases—Federal Communications Commission (FCC) v. Consumers’ Research, and SHLB Coalition v. Consumers’ Research. On July 24, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that the Universal Service Fund was unconstitutional becau…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 65% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage