U.S. Supreme Court to examine birthright citizenship Wednesday
The Supreme Court reviews the constitutionality of Trump's 2025 executive order denying citizenship to children of illegal or temporary resident parents under the 14th Amendment.
- On Wednesday, the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in Trump v. Barbara, challenging President Donald Trump's January 20, 2025 executive order that seeks to end birthright citizenship for children born to parents present illegally or temporarily.
- President Trump signed Executive Order 14160 on his first day back in office, asserting the 14th Amendment's 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' clause does not automatically grant citizenship to children of parents without legal status.
- Citing the 1898 Supreme Court precedent in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, lower courts have uniformly blocked the policy, ruling birthright citizenship applies to children of non-citizens domiciled in the United States.
- Implementation could create a 'tidal wave of legal confusion and chaos,' according to Jill Habig, CEO of Public Rights Project, potentially affecting more than one-quarter of a million babies born annually.
- A final decision from the Supreme Court is expected by late June or early July, determining whether birthright citizenship will be upheld or restricted under the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause.
128 Articles
128 Articles
White House: Iran Is Increasingly Eager to Negotiate; Supreme Court to Decide on Birthright Citizenship
The White House said Iran is increasingly eager to come to the negotiating table. Find out what we know about whom the United States is talking to at the moment. Most Transportation Security Administration agents are now receiving back pay while the Department of Homeland Security shutdown continues. Border czar Tom Homan said Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents will stay at airports until operations return to normal. A high-stakes case h…
LISTEN LIVE: Supreme Court considers constitutionality of Trump’s birthright citizenship order
The call to repeal birthright citizenship is part of the Trump administration's broader crackdown on immigrants. The case presents another test for a high court that has allowed some anti-immigration efforts to continue, even after lower courts had blocked them.
The U.S. Supreme Court disputes over President Donald Trump's order to deny the citizenry to U.S.-born children.
The Needle: Trump Admin Cites White Supremacists in Court Filings, Sharpie Disputes Trump’s Story About $5 Custom Markers
Devil in the details: In a report published Sunday, the Post and Courier corroborated key details in the claims made by a woman who said convicted felon and President Donald Trump sexually abused her when she was as young as 13. The paper corroborated personal details provided by the woman about a third man, Jimmy Atkins, who she said also sexually assaulted her. The Post and Courier has not corroborated the accusations against Trump, which the …
Can Trump rewrite birthright citizenship? The Supreme Court's moment of truth has arrived
Has birthright citizenship ever been legally defined? Not really -- and a 160-year-old constitutional gap is now at the heart of a Supreme Court showdown over President Trump's executive order restricting citizenship for children born to illegal immigrants.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 49% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium































